Chad Seifried

Abstract: The challenge of finding qualified reviewers of history (e.g., management, economic, business, etc.) is pronounced because there is a: 1) misconception that historical research is the same as qualitative research (e.g., ethnography, interview-based, and textual or content analytic studies); and a general 2) lack of awareness by many historians regarding writing norms for management journals. This work will communicate information to historians about the writing expectations in leading sport management journals and differentiate historical from qualitative research for non-historians. Next, this review offers an interpretation of what the historical writing and research process entails and presents evidence of historical research in sport management studies. Finally, this work provides recommendations to historical researchers and potential editors and peer reviewers of historical research to improve the quality of the review process and subsequent negotiation for authors and referees to help all learn from their differences for the potential benefit of the field.

Citation: Seifried, C. (2017). Peer reviewing historical research for sport management: It’s not qualitative research. International Journal of Sport Management, 18(4), 461-487.

References

• Alasuutari, P., Bickman, L., & Brannen, J. (2008). (eds). The SAGE handbook of social research methods. London: Sage.
• Alexander, J. (2007). Environmental sustainability versus profit maximization: Overcoming systematic constraints on implementing normatively preferable alternatives, Journal Business Ethics, 76, 155-162.
• Andrew, D., Pedersen, P., & McEvoy, C. (2011). Research methods and design in sport management. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
• Bailey, J.R., & Ford, C.M. (2003). Innovation and evolution: Managing tension within and between the domains of theory and practice. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.). International handbook on innovation (pp. 248-257). Hillsdale, NJ: Elsevier.
• Bale, J. (2001). Sport, space, and the city. Caldwell, NJ: The Blackborn Press.
• Bazerman, C. (1981). What written knowledge does: Three examples of academic discourse. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 361-382.
• Bedeian, A.G. (2003). The manuscript review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 331-338.
• Bedeian, A.G. (2004). Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3, 198-216.
• Bedeian, A.G., & Field, Jr., H.S. (1980). Academic stratification in graduate management programs: Departmental prestige and faculty hiring patterns. Journal of Management, 6, 99-115.
• Berg, B. L. (1998). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Berg, B.L., & Lune, H. (2012). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Pearson.
• Booth, C., & Rowlinson, M. (2006). Management and organizational history: Prospects. Management and Organizational History, 1, 5-30.
• Booth, D. (2005). The field: Truth and fiction in sport history. New York: Routledge.
• Buchanan, D.A., & Bryman, A. (2009). The Sage handbook of organizational research methods. London: Sage.
• Burrell, G. (1997). Pandemonium: Towards a retro-organizational theory. London: SAGE.
• Carpenter, M. (2009). Editor’s comments: Mentoring colleagues in the craft and spirit of peer review. Academy of Management Review, 34, 191-195.
• Chandler, A.D., Jr. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
• Chubin, D.E., & Hackett, E.J. (1990). Peerless science: Peer review and U.S. science policy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
• Clark, P., & M. Rowlinson. (2006). The treatment of history in organization studies: Toward an ‘historic turn’? Business History, 46, 331-352.
• Cox, R.W., & Salter, M.A. (1998). The IT revolution and the practice of sport history: An overview and reflection on internet research and teaching resources. Journal of Sport History 25, 283-302.
• Day, N.E. (2011). The silent majority: Manuscript rejection and its impact on scholars. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10, 704-718.
• Decker, S. (2013). The silence of the archives: Business history, post-colonialism, and archival ethnography. Management & Organizational History, 8, 155-173.
• de Wilde, A., & Seifried, C. (2012). An analysis of research methods in leading sports management journals: The dearth of historical methods in sports management. International Journal of Sports Management, 13, 1-17.
• de Wilde, A., Seifried, C.S., & Adelman, M.L. (2010). The culture of history in sport management’s foundation: The intellectual influence of Harvard Business School on four founding sport management scholars. Quest, 62, 406-422.
• de Wilde, A., Seifried, C.S., Hardy, S., Kay, K., Ross, A., & Sullivan, G. (2012). The big picture: How historical studies can help sport managers. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the North American Society for Sport Management Conference, Seattle, WA.
• Donnelly, M., & Norton, C. (2011). Doing history. London: Routledge.
• Driver, M. (2007). Reviewer feedback as discourse of the other: A psychoanalytic perspective onthe manuscript review process. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16, 351-360.
• Duncan, W.J., Ford, E.W., Rousculp, M.D., & Ginter, P.M. (2002). Community of scholars: An exploratory study of management laureates. Scientometrics, 55, 395-409.
• Ellis, G.W., Rudnitsky, A., & Silverstein, B. (2004). Using concept maps to enhance understanding in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20, 1012-1021.
• Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-50.
• Eisenhardt, K.M., & Graebner, M.G. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25-32.
• Eisenhart, M. (2002). The paradox of peer review: Admitting too much or allowing too little? Research in Science Education, 32, 241-255.
• Fielding, L.W., & Miller, L.K. (1996). Advertising and the development of consumer purchasing criteria: The sporting goods industry, 1900-1930. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 5, 37–50.
• Fielding, L.W., Miller, L.K., & Brown, J.R. (1999). Harlem Globetrotters International, Inc. Journal of Sport Management, 13, 45–77.
• Forbes, D., & Kirsch, D. (2010). The study of emerging industries: Recognizing and responding to some central problems. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 589-602.
• Forsberg, T. (2011). Normative power Europe, once again: A conceptual analysis of an ideal type. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49, 1183-1204.
• Gaddis, J.L. (2002). The landscape of history: How historians map the past. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Galambos, L. (2003). Identity and the boundaries of business history: An essay on consensus and creativity. In F. Amatori and G. Jones (Eds.), Business History around the World (pp. 11-30). New York: Cambridge University Press:
• Golder, P.N. (2000). Historical method in marketing research with new evidence on long-term market share stability. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 156-172.
• Gough, P. (2004). Corporations and commemorations: First World War remembrance, Lloyds TSB and the National Memorial Arboretum. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 10, 435-455.
• Girginov, V., & Sandanski, I. (2008). Understanding the changing nature of sports organizations in transforming societies. Sport Management Review, 11, 21–50.
• Graebner, M.E., & Eisenhardt, K.M. (2004). The seller’s side of the story: Acquisition as courtship and governance as syndicate in entrepreneurial firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 366-403.
• Gratton, C. & Jones, I. (2010). Research methods for sport studies. New York: Taylor & Francis.
• Hamilton, C. (2002). Living by fluidity: Oral histories, material custodies and the politics of archiving. In C. Hamilton (Ed.) Refiguring the archive (pp. 209-228). Cape Town: David Philip.
• Hardy, S. (1986). Entrepreneurs, organizations, and the sport marketplace: Subjects in search of historians. Journal of Sport History, 13, 14–33.
• Hardy, S. (1990a). Entrepreneurs, structures, and the sportgeist: Old tensions in a modern industry. In D. Kyle & G. Stark (Eds.), Essays on sport history and sport mythology (pp. 45–82). College Station: Texas A&M Press.
• Hardy, S. (1990b). Adopted by all the leading clubs: sporting goods and the shaping of leisure, 1800-1900. In R. Butsch (Ed.), For fun and profit: The transformation of leisure into consumption (pp. 71–101). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
• Hardy, S. (2006). “Polo at the rinks”: Shaping markets for ice hockey in America, 1880- 1900. Journal of Sport History, 33, 158.
• Hellawell, D. (2006). Inside-out: Analysis of the insider-outsider concept as a heuristic device to develop reflexivity in students doing qualitative research, Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 483-494.
• Howell, M., & Prevenier, W. (2001). Form reliable sources: An introduction to historical methods. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
• Interchange: History in the professional schools. (2005). The Journal of American History, 92, 553–576.
• Kaestle, C.F. (1988). Recent methodological development in history of American education. In R.M. Jaeger (Ed.) Complementary methods for research in education (pp. 59-69). Washington, D.C.: American Education Research Association.
• Kaestle, C.F. (1992). Standards of evidence in historical research: How do we know when we know. History of Education Quarterly, 32, 61-66.
• Kellogg, D., Orlikowski, W., & Yates, J. (2006). Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in post-bureaucratic organizations. Organization Science, 17, 22-44.
• Kippling, M., Wadhwani, R.D., & Bucheli, M. (2014). Analyzing and interpreting historical sources: A basic methodology. In M. Bucheli and R.D. Wadhwani (Eds.), Organizations in time: History, theory, methods (pp. 305-329). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Kirsch, D. (2009). The record of business and the future of business history: Establishing a public interest in private business records. Library Trends, 57, 352-370.
• Kraus, J.W. (2008). Petticoats and primary sources: Lessons learned through public history. Journal of Archival Organization, 6, 141-150.
• Lee, T.W. (2002). From the editors. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 9-11.
• Lewis, G. (1964). The American intercollegiate football spectacle, 1869-1917. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
• Lewis, G. (1967). America’s first intercollegiate sport: The regattas from 1852 to 1875. Research Quarterly, 38, 637–648.
• Lewis, G. (1973). World War I and the emergence of sport for the masses. The Maryland Historian, 2, 1–24.
• Lewis, G. (1980). The sports enterprise. Arena Newsletter, 4, 12–17.
• Lewis, G., & Appenzeller, H. (1985). Successful sport management. Charlottesville, VA: The Mitchie Company.
• Li, M., Pitts, B., & Quarterman, J. (2008). Research methods in sport management. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
• Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet, 358, 483–488.
• Mason, R.O., McKenney, J.L., & Copeland, D. G. (1997). An historical method for MIS research: Steps and assumptions. MIS Quarterly, 21, 307-20.
• McDowell, M.L. (2015). Towards a critical dialogue between the history of sport, management history, and sport management/organizational studies in research and teaching. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 32, 1750-1758.
• McDowell, W.H. (2002). Historical research: A guide. New York: Longman.
• Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Miller, C.C. (2006). Peer review in the organizational and management sciences. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 425-431.
• Miner, J.B. (2003). Commentary on Arthur Bedeian’s “The manuscript review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors.” Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 339-343.
• Morrow, D., & Waters, J. (1982). Method in sport history: A content analysis approach. Sport History Review, 13, 30-37.
• Mullin, B., Hardy, S., & Sutton, W. A. (2014). Sport marketing (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
• Myers, M.D. (2013). Qualitative research in business & management. Los Angeles: Sage.
• Orlikowski, W., & Yates, J. (1994). Genre repertoire: Examining the structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 541-574.
• Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Pettigrew, A.M. (1985a). The awakening giant: Continuity and change in imperial chemical industries. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Pettigrew, A.M. (1985b). Contextualist research and the study of organizational change processes. In E. Lawler (Ed.). Doing research that is useful for theory and practice (pp. 53-72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Pitts, B.G., Fielding, L.W., & Miller, L.K. (1994). Industry segmentation theory and the sport industry. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 3, 15–24.
• Reyes, I., & Azuara, P. (2011). Emergent biliteracy in young Mexican immigrant children, Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 374-398.
• Roth, W.M. (2002). Editorial power/authorial suffering. Research in Science Education, 32, 215-240.
• Rowlinson, M., Hassard, J., & Decker, S. (2014). Research strategies for organizational history: A dialogue between historical theory and organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 39, 250-274.
• Seifried, C.S. (2010). Introducing and analyzing historical methodology for Sport Management studies. International Journal of Sport Management, 11, 1-21.
• Seifried, C.S. & de Wilde, A. (2014). Building the Garden; Building New York: George “Tex” Rickard, public relations and his legacy in sport marketing. Journal of Macro-marketing, 34, 452-470.
• Seifried, C.S., & Katz, M. (2015). The United States Armed Forces and their “Bowl” games from 1942 to 1967: An example of organizational innovation in action. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22, 231-247.
• Seifried, C.S., Katz, M., & Tutka, P. (2017). A conceptual model on the process of innovation diffusion through a historical review of the United States Armed Forces and their bowl games. Sport Management Review, 20, 379-394.
• Siau, K., & Tan, X. (2005). Improving the quality of conceptual modeling using cognitive mapping techniques. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 55, 343-365.
• Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
• Skinner, J. & Edwards, A. (2011). Research methods for sport management. New York: Taylor & Francis.
• Smith, B., Sparkes, A.C., & Caddick, N. (2014). Judging qualitative research. In L. Nelson, R. Groom, & P. Potrac (Eds.). Research methods in sports coaching (pp. 192-201). New York: Routledge.
• Soliva, R. (2007). Landscape stories: Using ideal type narratives as a heuristic device in rural studies. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 62-74.
• Starbuck, W.H. (2003). Turning lemons into lemonade: Where is the value in peer reviews? Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 344-351.
• Starbuck, W.H. (2005). How much better are the most prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication. Organization Science, 16, 180-200.
• Stinchcombe, A.L. (2005). The logic of social research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Taylor, S., Bell, E., & Cooke, B. (2009). Business history and the historiographical operation, Management and Organizational History, 4, 151-166.
• Thomas, J.M. (2004). Neighborhood planning: Uses of oral history. Journal of Planning History, 3, 50-70.
• Tsang, E.W.K. (2013). Is this referee really my peer? A challenge to the peer-review process. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22, 166-171.
• Tsang, E.W.K., & Frey, B.S. (2007). The as-is journal review process: Let authors own their ideas. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6, 128-136.
• Usdiken, B., & Kieser, A. (2004). Introduction: History in organizational studies. Business History, 46, 321-330.
• Vamplew, W. (1998). Facts and artifacts: Sport historians and sports museums. Journal of Sport History, 25, 268-282.
• Vikstrom, L. (2010). Identifying dissonant and complimentary data on women through the triangulation of historical sources. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13, 211-221.
• Wadhwani, R.D., & Bucheli, M. (2014). The future of the past in management and organizational studies. In M. Bucheli and R. D. Wadhwani (Eds.), Organizations in time: History, theory, methods (pp. 3-31). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Warren, R., & Tweedale, G. (2002). Business ethics and business history: Neglected dimensions in management education. British Journal of Management, 13, 209-219.
• Washington, M., & Ventresca, M.J. (2008). Institutional contradictions and struggles in the formation of U.S. collegiate basketball, 1880-1938. Journal of Sport Management, 22, 30–49.
• Weber, M. (1959). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism; translated by T. Parsons. New York: Scribner’s.
• Yates, J. (1989). Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Yates, J. (2005). Productive alternatives: Flexibility, governance, and strategic choice in industrial history. In F. Amatori and G. Jones (Eds.), Business history around the world (pp. 66-82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Yates, J. (2014). Understanding historical methods in organizational studies. In M. Bucheli and R.D. Wadhwani (Eds.), Organizations in time: History, theory, methods (pp. 265-283). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structuration approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17, 299-326.
• Zald, M. N. (1993). Organization studies as a scientific and humanistic enterprise—Toward a reconceptualization of the foundations of the field. Organization Science, 4, 513-528.
• Zald, M. N. (1996). More fragmentation? Unfinished business in linking the social sciences and the humanities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 251-261.
• Zald, M.N. (2002). Spinning disciplines: Critical management studies in the context of transformation of management education. Organization, 9, 513-528.
• Zeigler, E.F. (2007). Sport management must show social concern as it develops tenable theory. Journal of Sport Management, 21, 297-318.